Joint Chiefs Chairman Says U.S. Preparing Military Options Against Iran

nadia's picture

The nation's top military officer said today that the Pentagon is planning for "potential military courses of action" against Iran, criticizing what he called the Tehran government's "increasingly lethal and malign influence" in Iraq.

Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said a conflict with Iran would be "extremely stressing" but not impossible for U.S. forces, pointing specifically to reserve capabilities in the Navy and Air Force.

"It would be a mistake to think that we are out of combat capability," he said at a Pentagon news conference.

Still, Mullen made clear that he prefers a diplomatic solution to the tensions with Iran and does not foresee any imminent military action. "I have no expectations that we're going to get into a conflict with Iran in the immediate future," he said.

Mullen's statements and others by Defense Secretary Robert Gates recently signal a new rhetorical onslaught by the Bush administration against Iran, amid what officials say is increased Iranian provision of weapons, training, and financing to Iraqi groups that are attacking and killing Americans.

In a speech Monday at West Point, Gates said that Iran "is hell-bent on acquiring nuclear weapons." He said a war with Iran would be "disastrous on a number of levels. But the military option must be kept on the table given the destabilizing policies of the regime and the risks inherent in a future Iranian nuclear threat."

Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, who was nominated this week to head all U.S. forces in the Middle East, is preparing a briefing soon to lay out detailed evidence of increased Iranian involvement in Iraq, Mullen said. The briefing will detail, for example, the discovery in Iraq of weapons that were very recently manufactured in Iran, he said.

"The Iranian government pledged to halt such activities some months ago. It's plainly obvious they have not. Indeed, they seem to have gone the other way," Mullen said.

He said recent unrest in the southern Iraqi city of Basra had highlighted a "level of involvement" by Iran that had not been understood by the U.S. military previously. "It became very, very visible in ways that we hadn't seen before," he said.

But while Mullen and Gates have recently stated that the Tehran government certainly must know of Iranian actions in Iraq, which they say are led by Iran's Revolutionary Guard, or Quds Force, Mullen said he has "no smoking gun which could prove that the highest leadership [of Iran] is involved in this."

In an incident early Thursday local time, a cargo ship contracted by the U.S. military fired "several bursts" of warning shots at two fast boats that approached in international waters off the Iranian coast, defense officials said today.

The unidentified small boats approached the Westward Venture, a ship carrying U.S. military hardware, as it headed north through the central Persian Gulf at about 8:00 a.m. local time, said Commander Lydia Robertson, spokeswoman for the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet, which is based in Bahrain.

The U.S. ship initiated bridge-to-bridge communications, and, after receiving no response, it fired a flare. The speed boats continued to approach, so the ship fired warning shots with a 50-caliber machine gun and M-16 rifle. The boats then left the area, she said.

"They fired several bursts, it went pretty quickly," Robertson said.

Soon afterwards, an Iranian coast guard boat queried the Western Venture, Robertson said. It was unclear whether that was one of the small boats.

"There have been some Iranian boats that have operated this way, and some unidentified boats," said Robertson, adding that the crew had no voice communication with the small boats.

In January, five Iranian patrol boats sped toward a U.S. warship and dropped small, boxlike objects in the water, an incident that alarmed military officials and that President Bush called "a provocative act." The objects turned out to pose no threat to the USS Port Royal or two other U.S. vessels accompanying it.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/25/AR2008042501480_pf.html


No votes yet

1 Comments

What is very, very

desertique
desertique's picture

What is very, very disturbing is the threat by Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to obliterate Iran. Much as been said over the last few years about the misinterpreted quote (which was actually a quote itself) by the President of Iran about Israels fate in the Middle East. In short most sane peaceful people find his comments offensive but understand that Iran does not intend to obliterate Israel. Rather they believe that Israel by her nature, actions and illegitimacy will self destruct. But Hillary Clinton can threaten mass genocide on an entire countries citizens, one of the oldest civilizations in the world and the people of America are silent. The New York Times which endorsed Clinton for President did come out with a scathing editorial on her bellicose and offensive comments. The Saudi Arabian did likewise. Now the WMD arguments are shifting towards Syria. Syria in collusion with North Korea was developing nuclear weapons, a charge they deny. These revelations come at a time when Israel dangles the return of the Golan Heights in front of the Syrian Government, in exchange for their alliance against Iran. This is unlikely to happen. Syria is unlikely to sell out Iran and this is where US-Israeli policy fails, keeping us forever tied to conflict in the Middle East and the military industrial complex pockets fat with American citizens tax dollars.
Hillary's disgusting dehumanization of the Iranian people to gain a few more votes is an indication of just how far down she will take the American people to make history and subvert the constitution for a third Clinton Presidency. In addition it plays into the contractors who so generously funded her campaign. She is promising them continuance of that stream of tax dollars their way. The Iranian people do doubt take offense to the political pandering of this candidate and can continue to wonder if the political process in the west is indeed as free and open as we brag it to be.

Go as far as you can see, and when you get there, you will see further.

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <b> <i> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <u> <cite> <code><h1><h2><h3><h4> <ul> <p><ol> <li> <big> <small> <br> <center>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Link to content with [[some text]], where "some text" is the title of existing content or the title of a new piece of content to create. You can also link text to a different title by using [[link to this title|show this text]]. Link to outside URLs with [[http://www.example.com|some text]], or even [[http://www.example.com]].
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
50 + 42 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Link-to Banners

more banners here